Human Resources
Feature
 
< >
< >
< >
 
Profiles: What's in it for you!
 
< >
 


Beyond out-hustling and out-servicing your competitors

 
< >
 

Making Sense of Today's Career Sites.

 
< >
 
Master Vendor vs
Vendor Neutral

 
< >
 

9.8 million businesspeople profiles
and 15,000 new people added daily

 
< >
 

Why do some
companies experience difficulties
in failed executive successions, others have great success?
 
< >
 
The trait is a measure of drive and sense of urgency and is a separate trait from competitiveness
 
< >
 


For executive assessment processes to be effective, a number of key components must be in place

 
     
  Managing Risk & Cultivating Leadership Through Executive Succession
by Chris Horn, director, Spherion Corporation Human Capital Consulting Group
 
 

Obviously, no decision is more important to a business than selecting a new leader. At stake are millions or billions in shareholder value and-quite possibly -corporate survival. At the same time, the rewards for shareholders when the right CEO is selected are immense. A strong leader ignites a business, driving revenues, increasing market share and making smart decisions in difficult times.
It's not surprising that executive selection is a high-risk, high-reward process. The true surprise is how few organizations have strategic processes in place to reduce the chances of troubled CEO successions. At a time when risk in CEO selection has never been higher-turnover is at a shocking high and tenures are shrinking dramatically-companies are in dire need of methods that will improve their leadership choices.
Selection Decisions
Is there an intrinsic advantage in selecting an internal CEO successor rather than a candidate from outside of the company? While there are clear advantages to considering internal candidates who know the company and are better known to key decision makers, choosing from an internal pool never guarantees success. Common pitfalls to internal candidate selection include:
· Focus is placed on individuals rather than the characteristics and requirements needed for success
· Internal candidates are untested and inexperienced in different and challenging environments
· Reputation and past results become more important than the candidates' capabilities for the new role
· A mentor or sponsor loses objectivity trying to help a protégé succeed rather than focusing on overall consequences for the company
Alternatively, considering external candidates greatly expands the pool of talent, but companies are still susceptible to weaknesses in their selection processes. When searching outside the organization, companies often overlook the importance of thoroughly researching and assessing external candidates and rely too heavily on search firms to seek out the limitations, strengths and compatibility of potential successors.

While both options-selecting from internal or external candidates-offer advantages and drawbacks, the true test of the selection process' effectiveness is not in deciding from where the candidate should come. Ultimately, reducing the risk of CEO failure rests on the internal selection team's ability to define the requirements of leadership and objectively assess potential candidates for the skills, talent, vision and experience it will take to run the company.

The Assessment Factor
While many companies experience the difficulties in failed CEO successions, others have had great success in bringing on new leadership. For example, Cisco Systems has seen profit and sales increase tenfold and market value swell by hundreds of billions of dollars during John Chamber's tenure as CEO. General Electric® has become renowned for its approach to executive recruitment and selection, which has led to numerous successful leadership transitions.
How have companies like these been able to make good decisions and reduce risk in their selection processes? Time and again, the critical difference is executive assessments. Companies that incorporate rigorous executive evaluations and measurement standards into their succession and employee development practices minimize their selection risks.
In addition to helping yield the strongest CEO candidates, comprehensive assessments help companies better understand and manage internal talent in four ways:
1. Readiness
Assessment processes better calibrate internal views on a candidate's readiness for the next position and reveal what executives do well and what areas need improvement.
2. Retention
The career guidance that accompanies the assessment process signals to key executives the company's desire to invest in them and gives valuable insight on how to develop skills while building their careers.
3. Targeted Development
Through assessments, training needs are properly identified and a company can better select where to invest in development initiatives.
4. Formalized Feedback
Often lost in executive arenas, the assessment process legitimizes feedback and places focus on providing reviews and counsel in a structured, objective setting.

Components of a Thorough Assessment
For executive assessment processes to be effective, a number of key components must be in place.
· Assessor-A skillful talent assessor is needed to navigate the pathways of an executive's background and work experience to extract meaningful information and to project the likelihood of success.
· Clear-cut Criteria-The best assessments occur when there are clear evaluation criteria, such as requirements for a specific role, leadership standards, performance goals or skill competencies.
· Experiences-An assessment should examine work and life experiences that demonstrate the executive's accomplishments, style, motivation, education and career interests.
· Work History-Work history is rich input that reveals keys to the executive's successes and failures, including obstacles that were overcome and the resulting knowledge gained.
· Street Smarts-An assessment should give strong insight into the self-awareness and practical intelligence that executives possess.
· Overview & Outlook-A comprehensive final assessment should be done to quantify key accomplishments, weaknesses and strengths while providing a detailed and complete look at the candidate.
Choosing the right CEO has clear and measurable impact on a company and all of its stakeholders: customers, employees and shareholders. Although there is no foolproof system to ensure that the right leader is selected, comprehensive candidate assessments can help ensure that hiring or promotion decisions are made using relevant data and insightful investigation, thereby reducing selection risk. Good internal assessment practices also serve a company in ways far beyond CEO selection-strengthening individual performance and retaining key contributors who drive innovation and increase the organization's value.

Chris Horn, a director in the Human Capital Consulting Group of Spherion Corporation (NYSE:SFN), has extensive corporate and consulting experience in strategic talent management, succession planning, executive assessment, staffing and training. For more information, please visit www.spherionhumancapitalconsulting.com or call 919 474-3023.