Download Career and Recruiting Resources

Altogether, recruiters in the U.S. spent a combined 82 years -- yes, years -- reviewing resumes in July 2015 alone. What recruiters need is a way to cut down on the amount of time they spend sorting through resumes, but they need a way to do this that will not filter out great candidates for silly reasons, the way many ATSs currently do. What recruiters need is automated resume parsing/resume matching software.

Let's face the facts: employers and recruiters are much more willing (and more likely) to hire individuals that were recommended to them, or those that they have met before. Hiring contacts that they already have lessens the chance of hiring an under qualified candidate, and makes the process easier overall. Moral of the story is: networking will heighten your chances of being hired and will help you advance within your career.

When recruiters face animosity from candidates and hiring managers at the same time, it may seem impossible to please anyone. But it doesn't have to be this way. In fact, recruiters can please everyone. They can deliver great candidate experiences and great hiring manager experiences at the same time. All it takes is the right ATS.

For applicant tracking systems, this is the dawning of a new era. The ATS is evolving right before our very eyes, and these are our ten predictions on the future of the applicant tracking system, the most essential of the recruiter's tools.

In recent years, the phrase "recruiting analytics" has been bandied about a lot. Rather than skim the surface of this critical trend, this eBook will dive into what recruiting analytics are and explore the ways in which recruiters can use the right data to take their practices to the next level.

 If indeed it is possible and common to be both—to be a "Type AB" personality, can these opposite traits be reconciled, mutually compensatory or complementary, harmonized and/or integrated, for example, in one or more of the ways our individual and collective competitive and cooperative tendencies, traits and behaviors can and are?

Imagine: Depositors in principle allowed to queue up at bank wickets to redeem their dollars for labor, rather than for gold, or at least to feel reassured knowing that something very valuable, viz., labor, is backing their money, instead of worrying that they are saving and being paid fiat money backed by nothing (physical) they can identify, save official assurances and common consent that it is money. Under this scheme—which, as will be detailed below, has been implemented more than once in world economic history and on a massive scale—money becomes what in principle, if not in daily practice, amounts to a labor voucher, receipt, invoice, bond, I.O.U., or coupon.

If you are fearful that robots are going to "take 'ar jobs!", you need to know that there's something else they may take. If the European Parliament Committee on Legal Affairs May 31, 2016 Draft Proposal is any indicator, robots may as "electronic persons"—sooner than you might ever imagine or fear—also take their place in the civil rights, social security and supermarket queues and arenas, and perhaps even in a jury or witness box (e.g., in liability cases), or ultimately even in the voting booth.

Even if professional passion is explicitly, unequivocally and unanimously definable, questions remain: Should passion be any of these things listed? Should it be a prerequisite, expectation, concomitant or—as Alexander Pope framed it—master or slave of some (which ones?) or all jobs? When, if ever, and in what forms, is work (job or career) passion a delusion, a deception, a danger, an illusion, an encumbrance, handicap or otherwise a "mistake" and liability?

Embracing the folk-wisdom that "the squeaky wheel gets the grease", some job hunters push the pedal to the metal and try to win the job race by supercharging their job search with grandstanding, attention-grabbing, often outrageously dumb or brilliant gimmicks.We've all heard, read  or told stories about how some desperate, audacious, (over/under-) imagin

Two of life's biggest career decisions and influences involve ponds. The first is whether to choose a career path that will take you up an advancement ladder or, instead, to a lifelong generally easier-than-a-climb skate on, around and across at least one comfortably flat pond (allowing for jumps from one "steady-state" pond-based career to another equally flat one). This is the choice between "upward" career growth vs. unchanging career equilibrium in a "horizontal" job (or jobs) that doesn't change or evolve much.

The main purpose of this report is to examine the history, evolution and limits of the concept and forms of economic (specifically, job and worker) productivity at a time when human productivity is on the verge of being eclipsed by autonomous artificial and alternate biological systems (such as genetically engineered waste-disposing bacteria, chimera (spliced species), cyborgs or "GMH"—genetically modified humans).